To threaten with war, to threaten with peace, Vahe Hovhannisyan, a member of the "Alternative Projects" group, wrote about this. "Today another monstrous thing happened in our life. The current prime minister continued Aliyev's last words, threatening his own people with another war in the fall. Of course, perazhki, stretching, sibekh and other stupidity became more important in public life. unfortunately, this is our seriousness today, but in reality, a very dangerous process was started today. Accusing the opposition, which goes to the elections with the general idea of ​​guaranteed peace, of being a war party, means helping Aliyev to put forward new demands and conditions before the elections, and to say: "I, only I am ready to do them." You will see that they will not be late. It is the most suitable moment for the united response of the opposition forces. To send a clear message to one's own community is unity, consolidation, state thinking. Short and scattered answers do not have enough power to neutralize the monstrous trap of the current prime minister. If this government was re-established, then in the autumn he will say the following in the terms he mentioned. 1. If we do not change the constitution, there will be a war. 2. If we do not agree with the arrival of 300 thousand Azerbaijanis to Armenia, there will be a war. 3. If we do not cede one bank of Sevan to Azerbaijan, there will be a war. 4. If we do not make another demand of Aliyev, there will be a war. He will say and go to eat sibekh without care, like today. It will surely be like that. And today, this should be brought to the attention of the public, so that we do not face another disaster in September. Unfortunately, our people understood not in 2020 where they were taking them, not in 2021, what was waiting for them, and now, in 2026, there is a certain probability that even after all this, they will not understand what is waiting for them only months later. The opposition will become united, the opposition will have meaning, if it takes its own people out of the Nikola trap of scaring them with war and threatening them with peace," he wrote.

Pashinyan promised peace and brought 3 wars. Narek Karapetyan, a member of the political council of the "Strong Armenia" party, announced this. "We will bring strong peace," he said.

"It is difficult to perceive Nikol Pashinyan's speech in the European Parliament as a responsible speech of the head of a sovereign state. It was more reminiscent of an attempt at domestic political reprisal, transferred to an international prestigious platform. Instead of representing Armenia's state interests, security challenges and regional realities, Pashinyan used the European podium to label his own opponents. Pashinyan presented the representatives of the Armenian Apostolic Church and opponents of the government as a "party of war", trying to connect them with external forces and attribute to them a willingness to sacrifice Armenia's independence. In reality, this was not a political assessment, but a political labeling aimed at discrediting one's opponents before the international audience. When the head of the country presents a segment of his own society as a dangerous force or a tool of external influence from an internationally prestigious podium, he actually transfers the internal political conflict of his country to an external platform. Such a step does not strengthen the state, but shows the political weakness and mistrust of the government towards its own society. Another goal was also evident in Pashinyan's speech. He tried to present the political field of Armenia as a geopolitical confrontation, contrasting the government with the allegedly "pro-Russian war party". This narrative has long been used in the internal political struggle, but when it is heard from the European podium, it acquires a completely different meaning. It is more reminiscent of a report to Western sponsors than a speech by the head of a sovereign state. In fact, Pashinyan was trying to convince the European audience that there is a political opposition in Armenia that needs to be neutralized. In other words, the internal political struggle of Armenia is presented as a geopolitical struggle, where the opponents of the government are declared "supporters of war" or "agents of the influence of external forces". This is a dangerous and irresponsible policy that not only deepens public polarization, but also involves foreign forces in Armenia's internal political conflict. When the head of the country discredits his opponents and even one of the fundamental national institutions, the church, from the international podium, it is not a sign of a strong state, but a clear manifestation of the political crisis of the government. Such behavior shows that Pashinyan is trying to get legitimacy, "green light" from Western centers to carry out repressions inside Armenia.

Trump's administration is considering further easing of sanctions against Russia in the oil sector. This was reported by Reuters, referring to sources. Earlier, the US president told the New York Post that he has an action plan in the face of a sharp rise in oil prices.

We have worn out this government by initiating street struggles. According to opinion polls about 1.5 years ago, 60 percent were undecided, now - about 25-30 percent. In other words, we cleared the field for other political forces, even at the expense of ourselves to some extent, Robert Kocharian said during the "Big Politics" podcast. "It's good that there are others. Before, 5-6 forces entered the National Assembly, the current 3 is not normal. Our efforts, the street struggle created good conditions for the change of power, to some extent at the cost of our attrition. Everyone comes with programs, they are good, beautifully presented. The main question is who can do it, a person who has proven that he can do it, is capable, a political team that is a fighter, or completely new people who have that desire, but do not yet have experience, have not shown themselves in political struggle from a practical point of view. We have to position ourselves as a force and I, as a leader who is capable, has done it a couple of times, achieved quite serious success in a crisis situation and can do it the 3rd time. This should be our message to the voters," said the second president

Masoud Pezeshkian thanked the Kurds for supporting Iran. "I express my gratitude to the proud and worthy people of Kurdistan who supported Iran in these historic days. I share the grief of the families of the martyrs and the victims in these incidents. The governor and the armed forces, as guarantors of security, have a duty to resolutely resist any separatist act.”

Spain's responsible behavior in the fight against gross violations of human rights by the Zionist-American coalition and military aggression against countries, including Iran, shows that ethics and conscience still exist in the West, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote. "I express my gratitude to the Spanish officials for their position," he wrote. Earlier, we reported that Spain refused to provide its bases to the USA in order to attack Iran.

The United States must respect international law and bilateral trade agreements signed between the EU and the United States, the Spanish government said in response to Trump's statements. Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced that he was severing all commercial and economic ties with Spain, because Spain refused to provide its bases to the US to attack Iran.