Politics

Why Armenia can no longer tolerate the leadership of Nikol Pashinyan. Vardan Oskanyan

Why Armenia can no longer tolerate the leadership of Nikol Pashinyan. Vardan Oskanyan

Former RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan wrote on his Facebook page: "Today, the majority of Armenians are united around one belief: Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan must leave, and the sooner, the better. The differences refer only to the path of that removal: parliamentary no-confidence, mass protests, early elections or waiting for the scheduled elections of 2026. But there is also widespread skepticism that any of these mechanisms will work. But one thing is irrevocable: Armenia cannot afford to stay under Pashinyan's leadership for even one more day. The country stands at one of the most dangerous junctures in its modern history. The areas of national security, foreign policy, democratic governance, economic stability and national solidarity have been significantly disrupted and weakened during the years of Pashinyan's rule. What began in 2018 with promises of hope and transformation - transparency, justice, revival - has today turned into a period of self-reliance, incompetence and strategic failures. Today, it is obvious that Pashinyan not only failed to face the existing challenges, but also dusted the achieved achievements and deepened the vulnerability of the country. He must leave for the future of Armenia. It is time to forge a new path. At the root of Pashinyan's failure is the disastrous management of foreign and security policy. In a region where strategic depth is a necessity, he has led without experience, vision or discipline. His approach to Azerbaijan, with controversial rhetoric and unilateral concessions, has encouraged Baku and isolated Yerevan. During his tenure, Armenia lost Nagorno-Karabakh, more than 120,000 Armenians were displaced, and a centuries-old community was wiped out. These were not inevitable consequences of war. These were a direct result of poor and failed leadership that was unprepared to face the geopolitical reality.

30.04.2025

The Armenian side did not agree to exchange Meghri with Artsakh

The Armenian side did not agree to exchange Meghri with Artsakh

Levon Kocharyan, deputy of the Armenia faction of the RA NA, referred to the topic of Meghri, which has become the subject of discussion these days, and made a Facebook post. With facts about honey. 1, Heydar Aliyev agreed that Artsakh should join Armenia in exchange for Meghri 2, The Armenian side did not agree to exchange Meghri with Artsakh 3, As a result of brilliant Armenian diplomacy, a settlement proposal appeared on the negotiation table, by which Azerbaijan would only be provided with an overland road (overpass) through Meghri. 4, Artsakh would become part of internationally recognized Armenia, along with the Lachine Corridor 5. Despite the initial agreement, Azerbaijan refused this option at the last moment 6, Today, after the loss of Artsakh, Nikol Pashinyan is negotiating to give Azerbaijan a way through Meghri, without getting anything in return. 7, Artsakh was lost during Pashinyan's rule, Azerbaijan occupied an area larger than Meghri from Armenia and is not going to return it. At the very least, it is strange and dishonest when the perceptions of some officials from the initial stage of the negotiations are leaked, but the actual document that emerged from those negotiations and which clearly states that Meghri would not be traded is not disclosed. The conclusions should be obvious to anyone. These are facts, and the noise generated by the authorities and other forces about all of this is simply aimed at misleading the public again before making another one-sided concession.

30.01.2025

There is no question of withdrawing demands against Azerbaijan from international courts on the agenda. Yeghishe Kirakosyan

There is no question of withdrawing demands against Azerbaijan from international courts on the agenda. Yeghishe Kirakosyan

The issue of withdrawing Armenia's lawsuit against Azerbaijan from international courts is not on the agenda at the moment. This was announced by Yeghishe Kirakosyan, the representative of Armenia on international legal issues, on September 18, at the Second World Armenian Summit. "The judicial process continues, we are waiting for the court's decisions. International legal processes cannot be opposed to the peace process. Such contrasts are artificial. It is no coincidence that this comes from Azerbaijan, where this idea originated from. This indicates that Azerbaijan is concerned about legal processes. Lawsuits and decisions have a serious impact on the behavior of Azerbaijan. It is important to continue the process, it is a part of the peace process," he said. Kirakosyan explained that the legal process was initiated not only to restore the violated rights of Armenians, but also in terms of interstate claims, it is also a war of narratives. "In the framework of this process, many stories, which Azerbaijan has been putting forward for a long time, are denied. In addition, the positions of Armenia are being strengthened. The lawsuits concern not only the people of Artsakh, but the whole of Armenia. We are talking about the attempt to erase the traces of Armenians in the region," he emphasized. Kirakosyan added that an important part of Armenia's demands against Azerbaijan is the preservation of Armenian cultural monuments in Artsakh. "During the court proceedings under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, we submitted a demand for the protection of the cultural heritage of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, considering that it is one of the manifestations of Azerbaijan's anti-Armenian policy. erasure or falsification of history," he said. Kirakosyan reminded that the court satisfied this demand of Armenia by adopting an interim decision on December 7, 2021.

09.12.2024

They discussed a wide range of bilateral agenda issues. political consultations between the RA and Austrian MFAs

They discussed a wide range of bilateral agenda issues. political consultations between the RA and Austrian MFAs

On September 17, political consultations between the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Austria took place in Vienna. This was reported by the RA MFA. On the Armenian side, the consultations were conducted by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia, Paruyr Hovhannisyan, on the Austrian side, by Gregor Kösler, Political Director of the Austrian Foreign Ministry, General Director of Bilateral Relations and Common EU Foreign Policy Affairs. During the consultations, the parties discussed a wide range of issues on the Armenian-Austrian bilateral agenda, emphasizing the activation of high-level political dialogue and the deepening of inter-parliamentary cooperation. The parties referred to the activation of bilateral trade and economic relations, the prospects of further deepening of cooperation in education, culture, science and other fields, as well as the current programs in the fields of development policy and humanitarianism. A number of issues of the comprehensive and ambitious agenda of the Armenia-EU partnership were also discussed at the consultations. The deputy minister presented to his colleague Armenia's vision of achieving sustainable peace in the South Caucasus and the "Crossroads of Peace" project developed by the RA government. Reference was made to the latest developments in the process of regulating and demarcating relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as signing a peace treaty.

30.11.2024